Close
CDMO Safety Testing 2026
Novotech

IDDI starts Collaborative Research on Ground-Breaking Statistical Method for individualization of Therapy

Note* - All images used are for editorial and illustrative purposes only and may not originate from the original news provider or associated company.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access the Media Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Related stories

Designing Biotech Financial Models for Series B Success

Building a compelling Series B case in biopharma goes well beyond efficacy data and market size projections. Sophisticated investors are increasingly focused on CMC risk, licensing obligations, and the defensibility of your manufacturing timeline. This article breaks down what the financial model behind a strong Series B actually looks like and what quietly kills deals that should have worked.

CMC Bottleneck in Drug Development and IND Delays

Ask any experienced biopharma program manager what derails an IND filing most often, and the answer is rarely surprising: it is CMC. Not insufficient efficacy data, not toxicology surprises CMC. This article examines why Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls continues to be the most underestimated risk in early drug development, and what program leaders can do about it.

The Hidden Cost of Licensing in Biologic Drug Development

Royalties, milestone payments, and license fees are often treated as the cost of doing business in biopharma. But for early-stage biotech companies building toward an IND, these obligations can quietly reshape financial models, complicate investor conversations, and create downstream deal terms that are difficult to unwind. Here is what founders need to know.
- Advertisement -

The treatment of patients in clinical practice relies on the results of randomized clinical trials. The statistical methods currently used to test the treatment effects in such trials take into account a single criterion called “primary endpoint”.

This is an incomplete assessment of trial results, especially in oncology and chronic diseases for which quality of life and symptom control are of prime importance.  IDDI has contributed to the development of a new statistical method named “generalized pairwise comparisons” (GPC). This new method allows the analysis to take into account all the endpoints at once, whether they represent treatment benefit or harm, as long as these endpoints can be ranked in an order of priority. The method will eventually allow physicians and/or patients to define their own priorities regarding treatment outcomes, thereby leading to “personalized medicine”.

The objective of this collaborative research is to establish proof of the concept that the GPC method can usefully complement traditional methods for the design, analysis and interpretation of clinical-trial results. This objective will be realized after further development of the GPC method and its implementation in dedicated software for the various stakeholders in clinical trials: patients and their families, clinicians, statisticians, health-care organizations, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies.

This collaborative research will be carried out by a Consortium led by the International Drug Development Institute (IDDI) and comprising Bristol-Myers Squibb, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) and the University Hospital and Cancer Center of Lyon. The Consortium receives financial support from the Walloon Region, Biowin – the Health Cluster of Wallonia and Innoviris, the Brussels Institute for Research and Innovation.

B12 Consulting, based in Louvain-la-Neuve, will support the Consortium in the open source and proprietary software development. The project, called BENEFIT (for Biostatistical Estimation of Net Effects for Individualization of Benefit), will be led by Marc Buyse, IDDI’s Chief Scientific Officer. Damien Tremolet, IDDI’s Chief Executive Officer says: “We believe this project can radically change the analysis of randomized clinical trials in the era of personalized medicine. With this project, IDDI remains true to its commitment of being at the forefront of methodological research in order to develop new therapies in the most reliable, efficient, and patient-relevant manner.”

Learn more on Generalized Pairwise Comparisons:

Read background reference by Dr Marc Buyse:

    Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes in the two-sample problem: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.3923

Listen to the recorded webinars on Generalized Pairwise Comparisons:

    A New Statistical Method: Generalized Pairwise Comparisons to Assess Treatment Benefit/Risk
    Assessing Treatment Benefit in Immuno-Oncology

About IDDI:
International Drug Development Institute (IDDI) is an expert clinical trials service provider specialized in biostatistical and integrated eClinical services for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in several disease areas, including oncology and ophthalmology. IDDI optimizes the clinical development of drugs, biologics and devices thanks to proven statistical expertise and operational excellence. IDDI has offices in Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium), Boston (MA) and Raleigh (NC) USA.

Latest stories

Related stories

Designing Biotech Financial Models for Series B Success

Building a compelling Series B case in biopharma goes well beyond efficacy data and market size projections. Sophisticated investors are increasingly focused on CMC risk, licensing obligations, and the defensibility of your manufacturing timeline. This article breaks down what the financial model behind a strong Series B actually looks like and what quietly kills deals that should have worked.

CMC Bottleneck in Drug Development and IND Delays

Ask any experienced biopharma program manager what derails an IND filing most often, and the answer is rarely surprising: it is CMC. Not insufficient efficacy data, not toxicology surprises CMC. This article examines why Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls continues to be the most underestimated risk in early drug development, and what program leaders can do about it.

The Hidden Cost of Licensing in Biologic Drug Development

Royalties, milestone payments, and license fees are often treated as the cost of doing business in biopharma. But for early-stage biotech companies building toward an IND, these obligations can quietly reshape financial models, complicate investor conversations, and create downstream deal terms that are difficult to unwind. Here is what founders need to know.

Early Phase Decisions Drive Faster Drug Development

Strategic early-stage planning and rigorous regulatory readiness serve as the foundation for accelerating pharmaceutical timelines and optimizing long-term R&D efficiency.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access theMedia Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Translate »