Close
Novotech
Jabsco PureFlo 21 Single Use

Scripps Research Study Challenges Conventional Theory of Modern Drug Design

Note* - All images used are for editorial and illustrative purposes only and may not originate from the original news provider or associated company.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

โ€“ Access the Media Pack Now

โ€“ Book a Conference Call

โ€“ Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Related stories

Designing Biotech Financial Models for Series B Success

Building a compelling Series B case in biopharma goes well beyond efficacy data and market size projections. Sophisticated investors are increasingly focused on CMC risk, licensing obligations, and the defensibility of your manufacturing timeline. This article breaks down what the financial model behind a strong Series B actually looks like and what quietly kills deals that should have worked.

CMC Bottleneck in Drug Development and IND Delays

Ask any experienced biopharma program manager what derails an IND filing most often, and the answer is rarely surprising: it is CMC. Not insufficient efficacy data, not toxicology surprises CMC. This article examines why Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls continues to be the most underestimated risk in early drug development, and what program leaders can do about it.

The Hidden Cost of Licensing in Biologic Drug Development

Royalties, milestone payments, and license fees are often treated as the cost of doing business in biopharma. But for early-stage biotech companies building toward an IND, these obligations can quietly reshape financial models, complicate investor conversations, and create downstream deal terms that are difficult to unwind. Here is what founders need to know.
- Advertisement -

Scientists from The Scripps Research Institute have uncovered new evidence that challenges the current theory about a process key to the way modern drugs are designed and how they work in the human body. The new study was published October 10, 2010 in an advance, online edition of the journal Nature Chemical Biology.

Currently, the theory about ligands โ€“ compounds that bind to proteins and trigger a specific biological action โ€“ and how they bind to proteins runs along the lines of a one person-one vote paradigm. Ligands are considered to be the relatively static partner in the process, and easily rejected if the protein dramatically changes shape.

In contrast, working with the molecular systems that recognize the hormone estrogen, the new Scripps Research study found that as protein receptors change shape ligands can adapt to that change, binding productively to both active and inactive structures.

“To our great surprise, the ligand bound differently to the active and inactive conformations of the receptor,” said Kendall Nettles, an associate professor in the Department of Cancer Biology at Scripps Florida. “This strongly suggests a novel mechanism for managing [cell] signaling activity. The implications of this are profound, both for our understanding of how ligands regulate protein activity, and as a novel approach in drug discovery.”

Changing the Drug Discovery Model

In the current study, the scientists worked with a receptor (which binds substances triggering certain biological effects) for the hormone estrogen and a well known estrogen receptor antagonist (which blocks the receptor). Estrogen receptors are activated by the hormone estrogen, which is one of two primary female sex hormones (the other is progesterone). Disturbances in estrogen levels play a role in number of disorders including cancers, heart disease, and stroke in women.

When ligands bind to a specific subset of receptors, the ligands stabilize specific protein conformations, turning on (or off) molecular switches that control diverse cellular functions. For example, the binding of the breast cancer treatment tamoxifen is specific for the inactive conformation of the estrogen receptor โ€“ this locks the receptor in place, blocks the active conformation and prevents tumor growth.

“Our new findings suggest that we need to think not only about an ensemble of protein conformations, but also an ensemble of ligand binding orientations when we think about therapeutic compounds,” Nettles said. “As the protein and ligand move together, each can have a unique affinity, and activity profile, which working together defines the signaling output.”

Nettles is excited by the possibility the new study suggests of working with an ensemble of ligand conformations, perhaps combining one with anti-inflammatory properties โ€“ which play a role in cancer โ€“ with another that blocks tumor growth. “This would give you dual therapeutic activity, potentially doubling the effectiveness of the treatment,” he said.

Nettles is also eager to find out whether the new study?s findings apply to other ligand-protein pairs. “If ligand dynamics turn out to be a general feature of small molecule signaling,” he said, “then our findings have the potential to transform how we think about chemical biology.”

The first authors of the study, “Coupling of receptor conformation and ligand orientation determine graded activity,” are John Bruning of The Scripps Research Institute and Alex A. Parent of the University of Illinois. In addition to Nettles, Bruning, and Parent, other authors include German Gil, Min Zhao and Jason Nowak of The Scripps Research Institute; Margaret C. Pace and Carolyn L. Smith of Baylor College of Medicine; Pavel V. Afonine and Paul D. Adams of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and John A. Katzenellenbogen of the University of Illinois.

The study was supported by The National Institutes of Health.

About The Scripps Research Institute

The Scripps Research Institute is one of the world’s largest independent, non-profit biomedical research organizations, at the forefront of basic biomedical science that seeks to comprehend the most fundamental processes of life. Scripps Research is internationally recognized for its discoveries in immunology, molecular and cellular biology, chemistry, neurosciences, autoimmune, cardiovascular, and infectious diseases, and synthetic vaccine development. An institution that evolved from the Scripps Metabolic Clinic founded by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps in 1924, Scripps Research currently employs approximately 3,000 scientists, postdoctoral fellows, scientific and other technicians, doctoral degree graduate students, and administrative and technical support personnel. Headquartered in La Jolla, California, the institute also includes Scripps Florida, whose researchers focus on basic biomedical science, drug discovery, and technology development. Scripps Florida is located in Jupiter, Florida. For more information, see www.scripps.edu.

Mika Ono
10550 North Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla, California 92037
Tel: 858-784-2052
Fax: 858.784.8136
mikaono@scripps.edu

Latest stories

Related stories

Designing Biotech Financial Models for Series B Success

Building a compelling Series B case in biopharma goes well beyond efficacy data and market size projections. Sophisticated investors are increasingly focused on CMC risk, licensing obligations, and the defensibility of your manufacturing timeline. This article breaks down what the financial model behind a strong Series B actually looks like and what quietly kills deals that should have worked.

CMC Bottleneck in Drug Development and IND Delays

Ask any experienced biopharma program manager what derails an IND filing most often, and the answer is rarely surprising: it is CMC. Not insufficient efficacy data, not toxicology surprises CMC. This article examines why Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls continues to be the most underestimated risk in early drug development, and what program leaders can do about it.

The Hidden Cost of Licensing in Biologic Drug Development

Royalties, milestone payments, and license fees are often treated as the cost of doing business in biopharma. But for early-stage biotech companies building toward an IND, these obligations can quietly reshape financial models, complicate investor conversations, and create downstream deal terms that are difficult to unwind. Here is what founders need to know.

Early Phase Decisions Drive Faster Drug Development

Strategic early-stage planning and rigorous regulatory readiness serve as the foundation for accelerating pharmaceutical timelines and optimizing long-term R&D efficiency.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

โ€“ Access theMedia Pack Now

โ€“ Book a Conference Call

โ€“ Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Translate ยป