MRR & Chromatography – Revolutionizing Analytical Chemistry

Note* - All images used are for editorial and illustrative purposes only and may not originate from the original news provider or associated company.

Related stories

Managing Quality and Regulatory Risks in Pharmaceutical Technology Transfer

Technology transfer moves more than manufacturing instructions. It moves process knowledge, supplier dependencies, labeling requirements, packaging specifications, and the evidence needed to demonstrate control. For medical device manufacturers, including those supporting drug-device combination products, these interfaces can become recurring sources of compliance gaps during site transitions, acquisitions, and remediation. The central problem is often not a missing procedure. It is a quality system that allows connected activities to change independently. A label revision may be approved while packaging artwork, supplier instructions, or production-system data still reflect an obsolete version. Staying inspection-ready requires manufacturers to manage these dependencies as one controlled system. Why Compliance Gaps Keep Recurring Findings are treated as documentation defects Revising a procedure can resolve an immediate discrepancy without changing the behavior that caused it. If unclear decision rights, weak escalation, or ineffective training remain, the same failure may surface elsewhere. Corrective and preventive action should distinguish the observed finding from its underlying cause and establish how effectiveness will be demonstrated. Ownership is divided across connected functions Quality, Regulatory Affairs, labeling, packaging engineering, operations, suppliers, and digital-system owners often maintain separate workflows. Each team may complete its assigned task while an interface remains uncontrolled. For example, changing an instruction for use can affect packaging configuration, translations, technical documentation, inventory disposition, and release controls. Transitions expose unresolved weaknesses Acquisitions and site transfers can introduce conflicting procedures, incomplete knowledge transfer, or different assumptions about validated processes. Regulatory changes add further demands. When these events coincide with CAPA or change-control backlogs, teams may prioritize administrative closure over risk reduction. Without a coordinated impact assessment, local fixes can create new gaps downstream. Establish the Regulatory Baseline Inspection readiness starts with knowing which requirements apply to the product, activity, and market. Pharmaceutical, device, and combination-product obligations are not interchangeable; transfer planning should identify the applicable requirements rather than assume one quality framework covers every operation. According to FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation overview and FAQs, the QMSR became effective on February 2, 2026, incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference, and introduced the updated device inspection process under Compliance Program 7382.850. ISO 13485 certification does not exempt a manufacturer from FDA inspection or guarantee compliance with FDA requirements. For devices marketed in the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2017/745, Annex I, Section 23, provides the primary requirements for information supplied with devices, including labels and instructions for use. Teams should assess the applicable provisions alongside relevant language, product-specific, and market requirements. A labeling review should therefore evaluate required content and consistency with the device’s intended purpose and supporting documentation—not merely artwork accuracy. How to Identify the Real Gaps Begin with a cross-functional assessment that follows actual product and information flows. Select representative transfers, label changes, supplier changes, and CAPAs, then trace each from initiation through implementation and effectiveness review. Map dependencies: Identify affected specifications, suppliers, packaging components, systems, validation activities, and training. Compare records with practice: Check whether approved procedures match what operators and reviewers actually do. Test traceability: Follow a requirement through technical documentation, labeling, production instructions, and release evidence. Examine recurrence: Look for repeated deviations, reopened actions, overdue changes, and findings shared across sites. Assess capacity: Determine whether qualified owners have enough time and authority to complete corrective work. Prioritize gaps by potential patient or user harm, regulatory impact, likelihood of recurrence, and detectability. Document the rationale; an old overdue item is not automatically more important than a newly identified high-risk weakness. Align Quality, Labeling, Packaging, and Change Control Create a coordinated remediation plan with one accountable owner for each action, named contributors, acceptance criteria, and required evidence. Separate immediate containment from systemic correction. Containment might prevent obsolete labels from being issued; correction might redesign approval and implementation controls so obsolete versions cannot return. Use change control as the integration point. Before approval, evaluate effects on regulatory submissions or notifications, technical documentation, supplier controls, packaging performance, validation, electronic master data, inventory, and training. Record both identified impacts and justified decisions that particular activities are unaffected. During technology transfer, define readiness gates before production or release responsibilities move. These should address the transfer of process knowledge, acceptance criteria, receiving-site capability, required qualification or validation, approved documents, and personnel competence. The appropriate evidence depends on the product and process; a generic checklist cannot replace a documented assessment. Finally, verify implementation where the work happens. Confirm that current instructions are available, suppliers received approved requirements, systems contain correct versions, and affected personnel can perform their tasks. A signed approval is not evidence that every downstream change took effect. Mistakes That Undermine Inspection Readiness Closing CAPAs on task completion alone: Effectiveness checks should test whether the underlying failure has been controlled. Updating labels in isolation: Assess packaging, supplier, system, documentation, and inventory consequences. Counting closures instead of evidence: Dashboards need defensible records behind their status indicators. ...

State of API & Peptide CDMO Capacity

Pharmaceutical companies planning peptide or complex small-molecule launches are...

What Goes Into Synthetic Urine? The Chemistry Behind Replicating a Biological Fluid

Synthetic urine sounds simple until you look closely at...
- Advertisement -

Even sophisticated scientific approaches have problems. For challenging solvents, liquid and gas chromatography (LC and GC), the gold standard for analysis and separations, might yield limited insights. Molecular rotational resonance (MRR) is fast becoming commonplace since it may offer structural information on compounds and isomers in mixtures without pre-analytical separations. MRR can reduce separation time, quantify difficult solvents, and offer the sensitivity needed to test solvents in accordance with U.S. Chapter 467 of Pharmacopeia outlines residual solvent requirements for Class 2 combination C solvents, eliminating the need for consumables. After discussing how MRR may help structurally identify challenging chemicals and future reaction optimization applications, it will conclude that MRR belongs in the lab alongside existing chromatography methods.

Creating new medications is dangerous and expensive. About 12% of clinical trial medications are authorized by the U.S. The FDA estimates that developing a new medicine, including capital expenditure and costs for failed treatments, would cost $2 billion. Pharmaceutical businesses are under continual pressure to cut development risk and manufacturing costs. Regulatory agencies are also expecting more and earlier information as a candidate progresses through development and routinely assessing analytical methods and allowable ‘contaminant levels’.

Against this backdrop, the analytical laboratory must streamline procedures, enhance capabilities, and improve efficiency. Contemporary analytical labs have powerful technologies to examine and study samples of various kinds. These tools address research questions and assist manufacturing and quality control using chromatography, mass spectrometry (MS), Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

Even the most modern scientific procedures have limits, and scientists must develop new approaches to solve long-standing problems. Sometimes the solution is reinvigorating and modernizing an established technology for new uses.

Molecular rotational resonance (MRR) spectroscopy shows how a trusted primary analytical tool may be repurposed in the digital era. MRR has long helped fundamental scientific discovery by providing clear structural information on substances and isomers in mixes without pre-analysis separation.

Until recently, lab MRR instruments required adaptation or construction. A breakthrough in chirped pulse Fourier-transform microwave spectroscopy gave MRR renewed impetus as a transformative technique for applied analysis, and the first commercial MRR instrument holds the key to implementing the technology into routine use and solving analytical chemistry’s persistent problems.

MRR has several potential uses in the pharmaceutical business, including accelerating medication development.

Job-appropriate tool

MRR provides unequivocal structural characterisation, making a molecule forever recognizable.

Note that isomers in a combination may be firmly described without separating the components. MRR determines each spectrum pattern to create a 3D structure.

While NMR is the gold standard for structural identification, it lacks sensitivity in mixture analysis and requires professional interpretation of spectra. MS is sensitive but does not always detect isomers, hence it is usually employed alongside liquid or gas chromatography (LC or GC), which requires costly consumables and technique development time. Without reference standards, FT-IR spectroscopy studies are difficult to interpret.

MS speed and NMR structure may be combined in MRR spectroscopy. It has been the academic lab’s mainstay for difficult chemicals till now. MRR’s commercial availability might revolutionize ordinary, high-throughput laboratory applications.

VOS Analysis Made Easy

Pharmaceutical manufacture uses several solvents, which might jeopardize product quality and safety if not adequately eliminated. Pharmaceutical residual solvents are “organic volatile chemicals that are used or produced in the manufacturing of drug substances, excipients, or dietary ingredients”. Manufacturers have worried about their hazardous potential for medicinal items for years.

Residual solvent analysis of bulk medicinal ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products is important because solvents pose a health concern and effect physiochemical characteristics. Residual solvent testing monitors bulk pharmaceutical drying or verifies finished products. Differences in bulk medication crystal structure may affect solubility and formulation. Odor and color changes may also cause client complaints.

The U.S. government regulates testing to prevent quality flaws that might compromise a safe, regulatory-approved product. According to USP <467> Residual Solvents and FDA advice, Q3C Impurities: Residual Solvents.

The standard technique for residual solvent testing is headspace GC with a flame ionization detector (FID) or MS (USP <467>). This is limited because certain sample matrices include non-volatile chemicals that diminish analyte peak response or create volatiles that provide misleading responses for other volatiles.

Some solvents need more complicated analysis, which might delay decision-making. According to USP <467>, solvents in Class 2, Procedure C should be examined using a different method than headspace GC due to its lower sensitivity.

By eliminating consumables and solvents, MRR simplifies technique development for scientists. MRR identifies in-process samples with equal sensitivity and greater quantitative performance than GC systems and decreases analysis times.

Classifying Impurities

Drug synthesis raw material impurities may affect drug formulation quality, but identifying and quantifying them can be difficult. MRR may help validate pharmaceutical raw material purity as manufacturers have minimal control over raw material impurities, unlike most other essential process parameters. These impurities frequently react similarly to the intended chemical, introducing potentially dangerous by-products with similar structures, necessitating extra purification procedures.

Most methods use chromatographic separation, which requires time-consuming process development for each input material. Despite their simplicity and quickness, direct spectroscopic methods are typically inferior to chromatography in mixture characterisation. MRR can successfully differentiate compounds with substantially similar structures, including chiral contaminants, since it can be applied directly to mixtures.

A research quantified regioisomeric, dehalogenated, and enantiomeric impurities in two raw materials used to synthesize HIV integrase inhibitor cabotegravir using MRR. This matters because these raw materials may introduce structurally similar contaminants into the medication. This is the first use of MRR to quick quantitative monitoring of isometric and dehalogenated impurities in pharmaceutical and chemical raw materials (chiral and achiral analysis) in substances that are difficult for GC. MRR’s excellent resolution and selectivity to minor molecule structure changes allow quick measurements without chromatographic separation. MRR is an extraordinarily selective technique applicable to the direct analysis of mixtures, including isomers. The same paper proposes that “MRR can have unique value in pharmaceutical process analytical technology (PAT) and quality by design (QbD) programs.

Another research employed MRR in realtime reaction monitoring to swiftly describe chemical reaction yield, specificity, and contaminants, the first to quantify pharmaceutical synthesis process purity. Online instrumentation saves time by running constantly during chemical reactions. Its high resolution and specificity allow MRR to clearly resolve and quantify species in a reaction mixture, making it superior to conventional process monitoring methods. MRR is sensitive to small changes in molecular structure and can rapidly quantify isomers and other impurities in a complex mixture without chromatographic separation, so it was used to monitor the product composition of an asymmetric continuous flow reaction to hydrogenate artemisinic acid for the semisynthesis of artemisinin.

Another research shows how MRR simplifies analytical procedures by characterizing reactions. This work identified and quantified crude reaction mixture regioisomeric impurities. Novel synthetic chemical processes may produce complicated mixtures with structurally identical analytes, making product identification and quantification problematic. As reaction characterization can be laborious and require many manual steps to obtain pure products for analysis, MRR offers a technique that directly determines reaction yield and byproduct content on crude materials without reference standards, resolving many mixture compounds without purification.

Chiral Analysis in Action

Pharmaceutical companies lack quick chiral purity analysis. MRR provides a novel structure-based chiral analysis method. Chiral tag MRR makes measuring enantiomeric excess (EE) and chiral molecule absolute configuration easy. The ability of MRR to quantify EE without chromatography allows high-throughput reaction optimization.

A recent work (11) assessed pantolactone’s EE utilizing targeted MRR spectrometry without reference samples with known enantiopurity. Pantolactone, a chiral lactone used to synthesize panthenol and pantothenic acid (vitamin B5), is sold worldwide in personal care items and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals. The EE of complexes with tiny chiral tag molecules was determined using broadband MRR spectroscopy and chiral tag technique.

MRR resolves pantolactone complicated spectra due to different moments of inertia. Further examination of reference samples made from mixes of (R)- and (S)-pantolactone molecules employed a chirped pulse spectrometer to describe the complexes’ structure. MRR spectrometry was employed in EE analysis with identical analytical parameters and a 15-min sample-to-sample cycle time, quicker than chiral gas chromatography.

Broadband MRR spectroscopy tests match quantitatively with chiral GC findings and provide “significant reductions in measurement time and sample consumption.”

Supporting Deuterium Switch

Recently, selectively deuterated small compounds have become potential therapeutic prospects. Highly selective deuteration reaction methods are in demand due to these novel active medicinal components. Strategically replacing hydrogen with deuterium may modify a compound’s metabolism and metabolite distribution, increasing therapeutic effectiveness and safety.

Pharmaceutical companies are interested in this “deuterium switch”. FDA-approved deuterated medication deutetrabenazine may treat Huntingdon’s illness. Enantioisotopomers, chiral compounds only due to deuterium substitution, may be created via site-specific deuteration.

Drug APIs with chiral and achiral compounds may respond differently. Because chiral raw materials account for a large portion of pharmaceutical production costs, finding effective, cheaper synthetic replacements is important.

Direct Online Reaction Monitoring

Optimizing synthetic pathways is crucial to improving development success rates and is part of the US PAT project to enhance pharmaceutical manufacturing processes in real time.

The MRR method is appealing. With the right sample feeding mechanism, MRR can identify and quantify components directly from reaction mixtures without chromatographic separation.

A Bright Future

MRR marks a new spectroscopic age. While chromatography will remain a mainstay of routine analytical chemistry and other techniques will remain best for certain applications, MRR’s benefits in definitive structural analysis for mixtures, chiral compounds, and high throughput and process control offer analysts exciting new potential.

For the first time, labs may add MRR to their analytical arsenal in a strong, dependable, well-supported, widely-accessible equipment.

Never miss a pharmaceutical headline

The pharmaceutical industry moves fast – stay on top of it with our must - read briefings.

  • The top pharma and life sciences stories, straight to your inbox
  • The biggest news, features, interviews, and analysis
  • Dedicated coverage of the key developments driving the global pharmaceutical sector

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access the Media Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

– Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Latest stories

Related stories

Managing Quality and Regulatory Risks in Pharmaceutical Technology Transfer

Technology transfer moves more than manufacturing instructions. It moves process knowledge, supplier dependencies, labeling requirements, packaging specifications, and the evidence needed to demonstrate control. For medical device manufacturers, including those supporting drug-device combination products, these interfaces can become recurring sources of compliance gaps during site transitions, acquisitions, and remediation. The central problem is often not a missing procedure. It is a quality system that allows connected activities to change independently. A label revision may be approved while packaging artwork, supplier instructions, or production-system data still reflect an obsolete version. Staying inspection-ready requires manufacturers to manage these dependencies as one controlled system. Why Compliance Gaps Keep Recurring Findings are treated as documentation defects Revising a procedure can resolve an immediate discrepancy without changing the behavior that caused it. If unclear decision rights, weak escalation, or ineffective training remain, the same failure may surface elsewhere. Corrective and preventive action should distinguish the observed finding from its underlying cause and establish how effectiveness will be demonstrated. Ownership is divided across connected functions Quality, Regulatory Affairs, labeling, packaging engineering, operations, suppliers, and digital-system owners often maintain separate workflows. Each team may complete its assigned task while an interface remains uncontrolled. For example, changing an instruction for use can affect packaging configuration, translations, technical documentation, inventory disposition, and release controls. Transitions expose unresolved weaknesses Acquisitions and site transfers can introduce conflicting procedures, incomplete knowledge transfer, or different assumptions about validated processes. Regulatory changes add further demands. When these events coincide with CAPA or change-control backlogs, teams may prioritize administrative closure over risk reduction. Without a coordinated impact assessment, local fixes can create new gaps downstream. Establish the Regulatory Baseline Inspection readiness starts with knowing which requirements apply to the product, activity, and market. Pharmaceutical, device, and combination-product obligations are not interchangeable; transfer planning should identify the applicable requirements rather than assume one quality framework covers every operation. According to FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation overview and FAQs, the QMSR became effective on February 2, 2026, incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference, and introduced the updated device inspection process under Compliance Program 7382.850. ISO 13485 certification does not exempt a manufacturer from FDA inspection or guarantee compliance with FDA requirements. For devices marketed in the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2017/745, Annex I, Section 23, provides the primary requirements for information supplied with devices, including labels and instructions for use. Teams should assess the applicable provisions alongside relevant language, product-specific, and market requirements. A labeling review should therefore evaluate required content and consistency with the device’s intended purpose and supporting documentation—not merely artwork accuracy. How to Identify the Real Gaps Begin with a cross-functional assessment that follows actual product and information flows. Select representative transfers, label changes, supplier changes, and CAPAs, then trace each from initiation through implementation and effectiveness review. Map dependencies: Identify affected specifications, suppliers, packaging components, systems, validation activities, and training. Compare records with practice: Check whether approved procedures match what operators and reviewers actually do. Test traceability: Follow a requirement through technical documentation, labeling, production instructions, and release evidence. Examine recurrence: Look for repeated deviations, reopened actions, overdue changes, and findings shared across sites. Assess capacity: Determine whether qualified owners have enough time and authority to complete corrective work. Prioritize gaps by potential patient or user harm, regulatory impact, likelihood of recurrence, and detectability. Document the rationale; an old overdue item is not automatically more important than a newly identified high-risk weakness. Align Quality, Labeling, Packaging, and Change Control Create a coordinated remediation plan with one accountable owner for each action, named contributors, acceptance criteria, and required evidence. Separate immediate containment from systemic correction. Containment might prevent obsolete labels from being issued; correction might redesign approval and implementation controls so obsolete versions cannot return. Use change control as the integration point. Before approval, evaluate effects on regulatory submissions or notifications, technical documentation, supplier controls, packaging performance, validation, electronic master data, inventory, and training. Record both identified impacts and justified decisions that particular activities are unaffected. During technology transfer, define readiness gates before production or release responsibilities move. These should address the transfer of process knowledge, acceptance criteria, receiving-site capability, required qualification or validation, approved documents, and personnel competence. The appropriate evidence depends on the product and process; a generic checklist cannot replace a documented assessment. Finally, verify implementation where the work happens. Confirm that current instructions are available, suppliers received approved requirements, systems contain correct versions, and affected personnel can perform their tasks. A signed approval is not evidence that every downstream change took effect. Mistakes That Undermine Inspection Readiness Closing CAPAs on task completion alone: Effectiveness checks should test whether the underlying failure has been controlled. Updating labels in isolation: Assess packaging, supplier, system, documentation, and inventory consequences. Counting closures instead of evidence: Dashboards need defensible records behind their status indicators. ...

State of API & Peptide CDMO Capacity

Pharmaceutical companies planning peptide or complex small-molecule launches are...

What Goes Into Synthetic Urine? The Chemistry Behind Replicating a Biological Fluid

Synthetic urine sounds simple until you look closely at...

Danaher Prepares to Introduce Advanced AI-Powered Laboratory

In a significant step for pharmaceutical research, Danaher has...

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access theMedia Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

– Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Translate »