Close
CDMO Safety Testing 2026
Novotech

Merck’s Investigational Medicine Boceprevir Achieved Significantly Higher SVR Rates

Note* - All images used are for editorial and illustrative purposes only and may not originate from the original news provider or associated company.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access the Media Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Related stories

Designing Biotech Financial Models for Series B Success

Building a compelling Series B case in biopharma goes well beyond efficacy data and market size projections. Sophisticated investors are increasingly focused on CMC risk, licensing obligations, and the defensibility of your manufacturing timeline. This article breaks down what the financial model behind a strong Series B actually looks like and what quietly kills deals that should have worked.

CMC Bottleneck in Drug Development and IND Delays

Ask any experienced biopharma program manager what derails an IND filing most often, and the answer is rarely surprising: it is CMC. Not insufficient efficacy data, not toxicology surprises CMC. This article examines why Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls continues to be the most underestimated risk in early drug development, and what program leaders can do about it.

Gene Expression Systems Explained for Biotech Founders

Choosing a gene expression system is one of the earliest and most consequential manufacturing decisions a biotech founder will make yet it is often made without fully understanding what is at stake. This article breaks down the key expression platforms used in biologic drug development, what differentiates them technically and commercially, and why the choice you make now will follow your program all the way to the clinic and beyond.
- Advertisement -

Merck reported that final results from two pivotal Phase III studies of boceprevir, its investigational oral hepatitis C protease inhibitor, demonstrated significantly higher sustained virologic response (SVR)1 rates in adult patients who previously failed treatment (treatment-failure; HCV RESPOND-2) and in adult patients who were new to treatment (treatment-naïve; HCV SPRINT-2) for chronic hepatitis.

C virus (HCV) genotype 1 compared to control, the primary objective of the studies. The results for the primary endpoints of these studies, which were first reported in a news release in August 20102, and a broad range of further data analyses from these studies are being presented in oral and poster presentations at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD).3,4,5.

Dr. Peter S. Kim, Ph.D., president, Merck Research Laboratories said, We are excited by the results of these pivotal studies. In these studies, boceprevir substantially increased success rates compared to standard therapy, both for patients who received 48 weeks of treatment and for patients treated with the response-guided therapy approach, many of whom were able to be treated for 28 to 36 weeks he added.

In both studies, all patients were treated with a 4-week lead-in of PEGINTRON (1.5 mcg/kg/week) and an investigational dose of REBETOL (600-1,400 mg/day), followed by the addition of boceprevir (800 mg three times a day).

In primary results, addition of boceprevir significantly increased SVR rates compared to control
HCV RESPOND-2, which was conducted at U.S. and international sites, included 403 adult patients who had failed prior therapy, including patients who relapsed or were non-responders to prior treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin. HCV SPRINT-2 was conducted in 1,097 treatment-naïve adult patients at U.S. and international sites who were enrolled in two separate cohorts, one with 938 non-African-American/non-Black patients and the other with 159 African-American/Black patients.

Latest stories

Related stories

Designing Biotech Financial Models for Series B Success

Building a compelling Series B case in biopharma goes well beyond efficacy data and market size projections. Sophisticated investors are increasingly focused on CMC risk, licensing obligations, and the defensibility of your manufacturing timeline. This article breaks down what the financial model behind a strong Series B actually looks like and what quietly kills deals that should have worked.

CMC Bottleneck in Drug Development and IND Delays

Ask any experienced biopharma program manager what derails an IND filing most often, and the answer is rarely surprising: it is CMC. Not insufficient efficacy data, not toxicology surprises CMC. This article examines why Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls continues to be the most underestimated risk in early drug development, and what program leaders can do about it.

Gene Expression Systems Explained for Biotech Founders

Choosing a gene expression system is one of the earliest and most consequential manufacturing decisions a biotech founder will make yet it is often made without fully understanding what is at stake. This article breaks down the key expression platforms used in biologic drug development, what differentiates them technically and commercially, and why the choice you make now will follow your program all the way to the clinic and beyond.

AbbVie to Invest $1.4B in North Carolina Manufacturing Plant

AbbVie has outlined plans to build a major new...

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access theMedia Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Translate »